Commenti a: Open3600 revised http://fabrizio.zellini.org/open3600-revised L'uomo deve saper far tutto, la specializzazione è delle formiche. Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:53:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Di: Tony http://fabrizio.zellini.org/open3600-revised#comment-1017 Tony Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:55:15 +0000 http://fabrizio.zellini.org/?p=68#comment-1017 We are having very high winds today, over 100 km/h. I noticed that the maximum wind speed recorded by open3600 was 99.8 and thought that a little peculiar. It seems that the decoding does not include 100's. To allow for wind speeds greater than 100, I have patched rw3600.c as follows: 471c471 <     ws_station = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) +   (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 0.01; ---  >     ws_station = (tempdata[2] & 0xF) * 100 + (tempdata[1] >> 4) *   10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) + (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1 + (tempdata[0] &   0xF) * 0.01; 531c531 <         ws = (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 10 + (tempdata[0] >> 4) +   (tempdata[0] & 0xF) * 0.1; ---  >         ws = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 100 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 10 +   (tempdata[0] >> 4) + (tempdata[0] & 0xF) * 0.1; 539c539 <         ws = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) +   (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1; ---  >         ws = (tempdata[2] & 0xF) * 100 + (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 +   (tempdata[1] & 0xF) + (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1; We are having very high winds today, over 100 km/h. I noticed that the maximum wind speed recorded by open3600 was 99.8 and thought that a little peculiar. It seems that the decoding does not include 100’s.

To allow for wind speeds greater than 100, I have patched rw3600.c as follows:

471c471
<     ws_station = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) +  
(tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 0.01;
—
 >     ws_station = (tempdata[2] & 0xF) * 100 + (tempdata[1] >> 4) *  
10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) + (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1 + (tempdata[0] &  
0xF) * 0.01;
531c531
<         ws = (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 10 + (tempdata[0] >> 4) +  
(tempdata[0] & 0xF) * 0.1;
—
 >         ws = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 100 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) * 10 +  
(tempdata[0] >> 4) + (tempdata[0] & 0xF) * 0.1;
539c539
<         ws = (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 + (tempdata[1] & 0xF) +  
(tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1;
—
 >         ws = (tempdata[2] & 0xF) * 100 + (tempdata[1] >> 4) * 10 +  
(tempdata[1] & 0xF) + (tempdata[0] >> 4) * 0.1;

]]> Di: Tony http://fabrizio.zellini.org/open3600-revised#comment-814 Tony Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:20:28 +0000 http://fabrizio.zellini.org/?p=68#comment-814 Thanks Jay, your comment about dropping the compiler option certainly helped me out. Best regards, Tony Thanks Jay, your comment about dropping the compiler option certainly helped me out.

Best regards,
Tony

]]> Di: Jay http://fabrizio.zellini.org/open3600-revised#comment-417 Jay Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:46:59 +0000 http://fabrizio.zellini.org/?p=68#comment-417 Hi, sad; I received no reply so far. On the other hand, I found the resolution. Dropping the compiler option "-O3" did the trick. Jay Hi, sad; I received no reply so far. On the other hand, I found the resolution. Dropping the compiler option “-O3″ did the trick.

Jay

]]> Di: Jay http://fabrizio.zellini.org/open3600-revised#comment-389 Jay Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:32:21 +0000 http://fabrizio.zellini.org/?p=68#comment-389 Hello, I have been compiling your patched version successfully, but neither of the binaries would produce any outputs. In log-level 5 they stop at "open_weatherstation". The original version (0.2) works no problem, but there the wu3600 is missing. I acctually am looking for cw3600. You don't happen to have the source of it handy? A binary would be even better. Regards, Jay Hello, I have been compiling your patched version successfully, but neither of the binaries would produce any outputs. In log-level 5 they stop at “open_weatherstation”.

The original version (0.2) works no problem, but there the wu3600 is missing. I acctually am looking for cw3600. You don’t happen to have the source of it handy? A binary would be even better.

Regards, Jay

]]>